home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!DIALix!tillage!gil
- From: gil@tillage.DIALix.oz.au (Gil Hardwick)
- Newsgroups: sci.anthropology
- Subject: Fluvial paradise (was: Which Came First, Agriculture or
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <725618069snx@tillage.DIALix.oz.au>
- References: <Bzz16C.IsC@NeoSoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 08:34:29 GMT
- Organization: STAFF STRATEGIES - Anthropologists & Training Agents
- Lines: 31
-
-
- In article <Bzz16C.IsC@NeoSoft.com> claird@NeoSoft.com writes:
-
- > Those speculating on cultural evolution do well to
- > remember, as Mr. Chapman reminds us, that we need
- > more categories than the hunting-gathering vs.
- > agricultural vs. pastoral scheme into which it's
- > easy to lapse. In particular, indigenous economies
- > based on harvesting aquatic resources are quite
- > interesting.
-
- I think it also must be kept in mind that societies *devolve* as much
- as they *evolve*. Again, the various economic bases on which people
- rely for their sustenance are available today as they have been at
- any other time.
-
- Further, it is only big cities (known for their invention of linear
- time) which were unavailable during "prehistoric times". Today it is
- those big cities in seeking to secure "their" hinterland (in the name
- of peace) which impose so egregiously on other "backward" economies.
-
- What is happening now, as city-based industries decline? The people
- previously employed there are returning to growing vegetables, aren't
- they? Doesn't that mean a devolution from an industrial society to a
- horticultural?
-
- That is certainly the word being used in Australia to describe the dual
- process of urban renewal and rural reconstruction currently underway.
-
- Gil
-
-