home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!yale!umeecs!quip.eecs.umich.edu!kanad
- From: kanad@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Kanad Chakraborty)
- Subject: Re: new year's problem
- Message-ID: <1993Jan2.174010.6177@zip.eecs.umich.edu>
- Sender: news@zip.eecs.umich.edu (Mr. News)
- Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor
- References: <1993Jan2.1584.7529@channel1> <1993Jan2.160912.2596@zip.eecs.umich.edu>
- Distribution: rec
- Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 17:40:10 GMT
- Lines: 37
-
- In article <1993Jan2.160912.2596@zip.eecs.umich.edu> kanad@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Kanad Chakraborty) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan2.1584.7529@channel1> "eliot gelwan" <eliot.gelwan@channel1.com> writes:
- >>On 12-31-92 KEITH F. LYNCH wrote:
- >>
- >>KF»What property did 1987 have, that no year after it will have
- >>KF»until 2013?
- >>
- >>Prime numbers
- >>
- >
-
- Oops ! I didn't notice this before -- thhe above answer given by
- E. Gelwan is WRONG. 2013 is not a prime number.
-
- >Or, no repeated digits.
- >
- >>KF»What property did 1961 have, that no year
- >>after it will have until 6009?
- >>
- >>turn 'em upside down and see.
- >>
- >> |
- >>...eliot -*- Postlink: ->CHANNEL1 [R/O okay]
- >> | Internet: eliot.gelwan@channel1.com
- >>
- >>---
- >> [in Brookline MA 11:47 pm, Friday 01/01/93]
- >>--
- >>Channel 1 (R) Cambridge, MA
- >>
- >
- >Kanad
-
-
- My answer again : (a) No repeated digits; (b) same as Eliot's answer.
-
- Kanad
-