home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: Tim@f4229.n124.z1.fidonet.org (Tim)
- Sender: FredGate@ocitor.fidonet
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!wupost!darwin.sura.net!convex!news.oc.com!utacfd.uta.edu!rwsys!ocitor!FredGate
- Newsgroups: rec.org.sca
- Subject: Heraldic questions...
- Message-ID: <725261481.F00003@ocitor.fidonet>
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 19:02:28
- Lines: 24
-
- In a message to All, David Greenebaum wrote:
- DG> Hello from Bjalfi!
-
- DG> We're not talking about eliminating conflict-checking, we're
- DG> talking about eliminating the _requirement_ that individual
- DG> kingdoms' colleges of arms protect against conflicts in
- DG> other kingdoms. My guess is that (at least) half the
- DG> kingdoms will set up colleges of arms in which the conflict
- DG> rules are just as strict as the current ones. (It's less
- DG> work for those who write the rules, after all.)
-
- You want strict? Heh heh heh ... come to Ansteorra under the above
-
- system and I'll show you the *Platonic ideal* of "strict" brought to
-
- earth....
-
-
- To quote a character from an extremely post-Period light opera: "The
-
- prospect is Elysian..."
-
-
- * Origin: Herald's Point * Steppes/Ansteorra * 214-699-0057 (1:124/4229)
-