home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!mcsun!sun4nl!cwi.nl!tromp
- From: tromp@cwi.nl (John Tromp)
- Newsgroups: rec.games.go
- Subject: How to interpret the ko-rule?
- Summary: when position includes turn then passing may be forbidden?!
- Keywords: ko, repetition, pass
- Message-ID: <8469@charon.cwi.nl>
- Date: 27 Dec 92 19:24:54 GMT
- Sender: news@cwi.nl
- Lines: 21
-
- The following incident occured at a recent meeting of our local go-club.
-
- Two players were discussing a seki situation in which white had
- extended a single stone, after black captured the two of them and white
- captured back to return to the previous position. They called me over to ask
- what the ko-rule says about this. I explained that the position was not to
- be repeated upon which one player asked whether that includes the turn,
- because the only effect of the last three moves was that it was now black's
- turn. I said I remembered that the turn was indeed included, but was
- subsequently asked whether that means the black player was not allowed to
- pass. This struck me as very odd; surely passing should *always* be allowed.
- So that made be decide I must have been wrong in thinking that the turn
- is part of the position.
-
- So my question is:
- is there any rule-system in which the no-repetition rule
- includes the turn in the position? do they also state that a player
- may pass at any turn?
-
- regards,
- -John Tromp
-