home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!arizona.edu!misvms.bpa.arizona.edu!tswanson
- From: tswanson@misvms.bpa.arizona.edu (QUIS CUSTODIET IPSOS CUSTODES.)
- Newsgroups: rec.collecting
- Subject: CARDS: UD (Was Re: Which BKBALL CARDS do you like?)
- Message-ID: <22DEC199211173580@misvms.bpa.arizona.edu>
- Date: 22 Dec 92 18:17:00 GMT
- References: <105220092@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM> <1gt5shINNmgb@malibog.hal.COM>
- <1992Dec21.212607.10485@tc.fluke.COM> <1992Dec22.153432.3791@pixel.kodak.com>
- Distribution: usa,local
- Organization: University of Arizona MIS Department
- Lines: 22
- Nntp-Posting-Host: misvms.bpa.arizona.edu
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
-
- In article <1992Dec22.153432.3791@pixel.kodak.com>, fbrown@ssd.kodak.com (Frank Brown) writes...
- >>
- >> [...lots of complaints from others about UD...]
- >>
- >I did UD football last year. It was a big hassle to get the set I never
- >did get a Namath header or an SP2. I bought a box plus nine packs and
- >got 9 holo's of 3 players. 4 Montana cards nothing else. I had to spend
- >more money and trade to get as far as I did. No no more UD anything for
- >me. IMO they are the biggest rippoff card company around.
- >
- >Frank
-
- A number of people have complained about UD's collation and you can add me
- to the list. I have grown very dissapointed with UD with the single
- exception of the hockey issues. UD has consistently excelled with their
- hockey cards in player selection, photos, inserts, rookies, etc. Their
- collation still isn't great, though. I no longer buy any of their stuff,
- except the hockey. This year's set and inserts are terrific, IMHO.
- Sorry to get off the basketball thread ;)
-
- Later,
- Ted.
-