home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.soc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!mojo.eng.umd.edu!gsurbeck
- From: gsurbeck@eng.umd.edu (Gregory D. Surbeck)
- Subject: Bikeways (was Re: Cycling and Environmentalism)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec27.050006.4651@eng.umd.edu>
- Date: Sun, 27 Dec 92 05:00:06 GMT
- Organization: Project GLUE, University of Maryland, College Park
- References: <72359@cup.portal.com>
- Lines: 23
-
-
- I agree with John Forester that it is not reasonable to
- exclusively ride on paths for commuting or any other purpose. I also
- submit that bikeways can create a link avoiding heavily trafficked
- streets in favor of less-populated paths. Or a link between two areas
- connected by interstate or similar road where cycling is illegal.
- Cycling at road speeds for many cyclists is not possible. I
- cannot maintain (or attain, with current tires) 45 mph, the speed
- limit on many local roads. If a cyclist could maintain 35 mph, he
- would still be about 15 mph slower than traffic. 35 + 15 = 50, the
- speed many drivers drive at on the road. On most roads in my area,
- drivers exceed the speed limit. Who among us (besides Dave Harvey)
- can maintain 50 mph? I congratulate you for exceeding the ability of
- the majority, if not all, cyclists.
- Second, Mr. Forester (please correct the title if incorrect)
- says that cycling requires no more effort than driving a car. If you
- sway side to side in a car, the shocks might bounce; if you twitch the
- steering wheel, the car *slightly* shifts direction. Do the same on a
- bicycle and the results are much more dramatic. Driving a bike and
- driving a car are *very* different.
- The tasks which Mr. Forester demands of us to ride with him
- are simply beyond most of our abilities. What would you have us do?
- Give up cycling because we don't meet your criteria?
-