home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.audio
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!news.UVic.CA!spang.Camosun.BC.CA!dbarker
- From: dbarker@spang.Camosun.BC.CA (Deryk Barker)
- Subject: Re: CD SOund QUality
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.220306.2382@spang.Camosun.BC.CA>
- Organization: Camosun College, Victoria B.C, Canada
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
- References: <1992Dec19.151854.9918@leland.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 22:03:06 GMT
- Lines: 35
-
- kong@leland.Stanford.EDU (Kong Kritayakirana) writes:
- : MJF9968@rigel.tamu.edu wrote:
- : > Further proof of how one-track-minded people have become
- : > for the storage and reproduction of music.
- : >
- : > In other words, yet another "critical listener" who auditioned
- : > a $200 CD player versus a $200 phono set-up and decided
- : > that digital is inherently better than analog. *sigh*
- : >
- : > Living better through chemistry,
- : > Mike "Pi" Freeman
- : > MJF9968@rigel.tamu.edu
- : >
- : > PS-- I've been wondering: would it be possible to have
- : > an optical, analog format? Aren't LDs effectively
- : > that? Wouldn't such a system give us the best of
- : > both worlds: durability, convenience, *and* sound
- : > quality?
- :
- : You make it hard to answer your mail. You DID NOT make any argument. Who told
- : you that I was using $200 CD player? Who told you that I was using $200 phono?
- : You obviously did not know ANYTHING about my system. What made you make such
- : a statement? Your mail is just a shot by an incompetent person dissatisfied
- : with the point I have made. If you see the issue otherwise and have airtight
- : arguments, use it. Otherwise don't write this kind of shit.
- :
- : I am doing a PhD in EE specializing in adaptive digital filtering and I am a
- : musician and hifi fanatic.
-
- Now *there's* a rare combination.............
-
- --
- Real: Deryk Barker, Computer Science Dept., Camosun College, Victoria B.C.
- Email: (dbarker@spang.camosun.bc.ca)
- Phone: +1 604 370 4452
-