home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!crdgw1!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!daisymae!kellihmt
- From: kellihmt@daisymae.crd.ge.com (Margaret T Kelliher)
- Newsgroups: misc.kids
- Subject: Re: Homebirth vs. Hospital birth
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.204219.19144@crd.ge.com>
- Date: 23 Dec 92 20:42:19 GMT
- References: <1992Dec9.190715.20357@adp.uucp> <ANNE.92Dec20213836@dolores.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@crd.ge.com (Required for NNTP)
- Reply-To: kellihmt@daisymae.crd.ge.com (Margaret T Kelliher)
- Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center
- Lines: 44
- Nntp-Posting-Host: daisymae.crd.ge.com
-
- In article <ANNE.92Dec20213836@dolores.Stanford.EDU>,
- anne@dolores.Stanford.EDU (Anne Paulson) writes:
- |>
- |>Grun@intellistor writes:
- |>
- |> But what if things start to go wrong [in a home birth]?
- |> I have no statistics, but when
- |> things *do* go wrong, (which they do, sometimes, and without regard
- |> for the health of the mother) there is frequently _very little
- time_ in which
- |> to intervene. An ambulance ride would be too long.
- |>
- |>You certainly don't have any statistics. If you did, you would know
- |>that when things go wrong, there is virtually always plenty of time to
- |>intervene,
-
- I don't have statistics either, but I do have a story which convinces me
- that "virtually always" is not good enough. I haven't told my younger
- daughter's birth story (late August) because I didn't want to scare anyone
- unduly. Let me start out by saying that she seems to be perfectly fine and
- is thriving. But for a couple of scary weeks, we just didn't know.
-
- We had severe late decelerations (ie baby's heart rate *plunged* and
- stayed down after contractions), an emergency C-section (ie general
- anesthesia done *now*), and a blue baby who needed to be resuscitated
- more than once. Had we been at home, and required a 45 minute trip to the
- hospital after the trouble had been detected, I fear Colleen would have
- had very severe problems due to oxygen deprivation. She almost did anyway.
- No explanation has been found for our difficulties.
-
- |>obviously home birth is as safe for births that turn out to be
- |>uneventful, but it turns out that it is as safe for births where
- |>something out of the ordinary happens.]
-
- I have trouble believing this. Can you point me to your source?
-
-
- IMHO, you are playing the odds whichever you choose. I obviously believe
- the hospital provides better odds for emergencies, and am willing to run
- the risk of unnecessary intervention which I consider more of an affront
- than a true danger to either mother or child.
-
- Margaret Kelliher
- kellihmt@crd.ge.com
-