home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky misc.activism.progressive:9651 alt.activism:19866 talk.environment:5266
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!naughty-peahen
- From: Greenpeace via Jym Dyer <jym@mica.berkeley.edu>
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive,alt.activism,talk.environment
- Subject: NEWS: A White Paper for a Dark Future? (EC Transport Policy)
- Followup-To: talk.environment
- Date: 29 Dec 1992 01:32:27 GMT
- Organization: The Naughty Peahen Party Line
- Lines: 69
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Message-ID: <Greenpeace.28Dec1992.1732@naughty-peahen>
- References: <Greenpeace.28Dec1992.1723@naughty-peahen>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu
- Keywords: environment press transportation
-
- [Greenpeace Press Release from Greenbase -- Redistribute Freely]
-
- A WHITE PAPER FOR A DARK FUTURE?
-
- BRUSSELS, December 7, 1992 (GP) Today, Transport Commissioner
- Karel Van Miert will present the European Commission's white
- paper "The Future Development of the Common Transport Policy"
- to the Council of Transport Ministers. This white paper,
- meant to be the outline of a Community framework for sustainable
- mobility, does not solve the basic contradictions in the
- Community's approach to transport policy, and will therefore be
- an impediment rather than a means to achieve the Community's
- goal of stabilizing its CO2 emissions.
-
- In the white paper, the Commission acknowledges that the use of
- the private car has doubled during the last two decades, and
- that road freight transport has grown even faster, pushing CO2
- emissions from motor vehicles up 76% during that time. According
- to the white paper, emissions are likely to increase a further
- 24.6% during the next ten years. Thus, the growth in CO2
- emissions is strongest in the transport sector.
-
- This stands in blatant contrast to the need to reduce CO2
- emissions by 80% in order to prevent uncontrollable climate
- change -- as recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on
- Climate Change (IPCC) -- and jeopardizes the Community's
- declared goal of stabilizing CO2 emissions by the year 2000
- at 1990 levels.
-
- "Yet, the Commission has not drawn the obvious conclusion from
- the obvious trends," says Dr. Gudrun Lammers of the Greenpeace
- EC Unit. "Instead of giving a clear direction to its transport
- policy, it has compiled a shopping list of contradictory goals."
-
- On the one hand, an increased integration of European transport
- infrastructure, including 12,000 kms of new motorways, are meant
- to reduce congestion and improve traffic flow. This will make
- road transport easier and cheaper. On the other hand, the
- Commission states that even with an ambitious 40% increase in
- car fuel efficiency, the growth in the car fleet will make
- stabilization of CO2 emissions impossible in 2010! As a remedy,
- they suggest raising transport cost through taxation and other
- fiscal measures.
-
- In a study on road freight transport published on November
- 24th,* Greenpeace has shown that only a consistent transport
- policy including increased fuel efficiency, a drastic increase
- in transport cost and a redirection of infrastructure investment
- from road to rail, can make sure that the necessary CO2
- reductions are achieved.
-
- "Changing the Common Transport Policy is certainly more
- desirable than changing the climate," says Michael Johann,
- international coordinator of Greenpeace's transport campaign.
- "The EC has to cancel new motorway construction, make road
- users pay their external cost and introduce tough efficiency
- standards. A climate catastrophe can still be prevented,
- provided the EC adopts a consistent transport policy.
- Otherwise, this could be a white paper for a black future."
-
- * "Dead End Road - Climate protection in European freight
- transport", available at Greenpeace EC Unit.
-
- For further information, please call: Michael Johann
- 43 (1) 713 00 31 45
-
- Dr. Gudrun Lammers
- Greenpeace EC Unit
- 32 (2) 736 99 27
-