home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!daemon
- From: mim%nyxfer%igc.apc.org@MIZZOU1.missouri.edu (Maoist Intl'ist Mvmnt)
- Subject: DC:Statehood is Not Enough!
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.010856.933@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Followup-To: alt.activism.d
- Originator: daemon@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Organization: The NY Transfer News Service
- Resent-From: "Rich Winkel" <MATHRICH@MIZZOU1.missouri.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 01:08:56 GMT
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Lines: 133
-
-
-
- Via The NY Transfer News Service * All the News that Doesn't Fit
-
- from the Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM)
-
- MIM Notes, Issue 71: December, 1992
-
-
- D.C. statehood is not enough
-
- by a comrade
-
- One month before the elections Congress forced the most expansive,
- racist death penalty initiative seen yet onto the ballot. A white
- Senator from Alabama proposed the initiative, outraged when his
- white aide was killed recently on Capitol Hill. The tough-on-crime
- measure was markedly *not* a response to the deaths of hundreds of
- Blacks in the city every year.
-
- Studies have shown that the death penalty used as a tool for
- nation and class oppression. This particular measure went further,
- expanding the crimes for which the death penalty could be imposed.
- It also would have the executions performed in the District, but
- rather in the home states of the white guys who proposed this in
- the first place! The methods of execution were not specified on
- the ballot, and therefore could have included electrocution in
- Alabama, lethal injection in Texas, or gassing in North
- Carolina.(2)
-
- The referendum was overwhelmingly defeated, by a 2-to-1 vote. The
- loudest opposition came from church leaders and local politicians,
- including the Rev. Jesse Jackson and D.C. Mayor Sharon Pratt
- Kelly. But the strongest vote against the initiative came from the
- city's poorest, most crime-ridden areas. The media expressed shock
- at this, expecting poor Black people who are sick of crime to vote
- to kill other poor Black people who are sick of being
- oppressed.(3) The masses from the poorest neighborhoods know that
- the death penalty doesn't deter killings, and neither does
- increased police "protection."
-
- "Thou Shalt Not Kill" signs went up all over the city. Ministers
- opposed the measure on moral and religious grounds rather than
- political, but noted the disproportionate impact on young Black
- men, especially when the victim of the killing is white.(4) The
- problem is, some who voted against this initiative would vote for
- the death penalty if put on the ballot by D.C. residents.
-
- Statehood
-
- The death penalty measure was politically tied to the idea of
- statehood for the District of Columbia. And now that Clinton and
- more Democratic Congressional representatives have been elected,
- the statehood furor is moving at greater speeds, with continued
- begging of Congress for a statute that would create the 51st
- state. Statehood supporters are calling for voting representation
- in Congress and two Senators like every other state.
-
- Many believed that if D.C. residents accepted an initiative from
- Congress, all hopes of attaining statehood would be lost. Further,
- area politicians are now celebrating Clinton's victory, hoping it
- will mean increased autonomy and eventual statehood for the
- District.(5) (Remember, Clinton is the one who wants to put
- 100,000 more pigs on the streets and who brags about executions in
- Arkansas during his governorship.)
-
- One person noted that D.C. needs "more funding for education,
- recreation and after-school programs."(6) While an improvement
- over cops and executions, government-run educational programs will
- not stop "crime." The only thing that can possibly stop crime is a
- revolutionary reallocation of resources to the masses, which will
- not be accomplished through D.C. statehood.
-
- People fighting for statehood focus on the issue of taxation
- without representation -- D.C. pays highest federal taxes per
- capita -- and some liken the situation to that in Azania.(7) But
- what about those oppressed nations that do live in states that
- have "representation"?
-
- In 1973 Congress passed the Home Rule Act, which gave the District
- limited dominion over local affairs, but the federal government
- still retained veto power over all acts. Since 1979 the D.C.
- Statehood Party has been campaigning for a statehood initiative to
- bring more autonomy and self-determination to D.C. The name of the
- proposed state is New Columbia, a tribute to the colonialist
- monster Columbus.
-
- The proposed constitution and Bill of Rights sounds much like any
- other, including "freedom from discrimination" and laws against
- violence against people because of nationality, poverty, race,
- citizenship, sex, sexual orientation, etc.(1) These ideas sound
- great, but Amerikans have yet to see them put into practice by
- this white imperialist patriarchy.
-
- The call for statehood ignores the fact that Blacks, Latinos, and
- Indigenous peoples are oppressed even when they live in states
- with federal representation in Congress. The call for statehood is
- a liberal one, focussing on the racism of the status of D.C.
- today. But if we want ITAL real END ITAL change and not just the
- kind of change promised by Clinton and the Democrats, then we need
- revolutionary calls for an overthrow of the entire Amerikan
- system, not a call to include more Blacks in the ranks of Congress
- and the Senate.
-
-
- Notes:
-
- 1. "The Statehood Option" in Facts & Issues, League of Women
- Voters of D.C. Education Fund, 1985.
- 2. Flier of Equal Justice, USA; A Project of the Quixote Center,
- Hyattsville, MD.
- 3. Washington Post 11/5/92, p. C1.
- 4. Flier of "Committee Against All Killing."
- 5. W.P. 11/5/92, p. C10.
- 6. W.P. 11/5/92, p. C14.
- 7. Community News, Howard University 6/7/90.
-
-
- Subscribe to MIM Notes:
-
- Individual: Institutional:
- 1 year domestic $12 1 year domestic $48
- 2 years domestic $20 2 years domestic $90
- 1 year overseas $36 1 year overseas $60
-
- Make checks payable to "ABS" or send cash.
- MIM, PO Box 3576, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-3576
- ---
- email: mim%nyxfer@igc.apc.org
-
-
- NY Transfer News Service * All the News that Doesn't Fit
- Modem: 718-448-2358 * Internet: nytransfer@igc.apc.org
-