home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!psgrain!puddle!f33.n214.z1.fidonet.org!Jim.Maroon
- From: Jim.Maroon@f33.n214.z1.fidonet.org (Jim Maroon)
- Sender: ufgate@puddle.fidonet.org (newsout1.26)
- Newsgroups: k12.ed.science
- Subject: Re: animals
- Message-ID: <33648.2B3F16BE@puddle.fidonet.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 92 10:06:00 PDT
- Organization: FidoNet node 1:214/33 - Tulare County Schoo, Visalia CA
- Lines: 27
-
- -=> Quoting Joshua Kramer to Sharon Harms <=-
-
- SH>question was, Should rabbits be used for testing of lotions,
- SH>shampoos and conditioners? Yhis can go for any animal not just
- SH>rabbits. I think it is better to test the product on animals
- SH>before msrketing the product rather than putting it out on market
-
- JK> I disagree... the cosmetics that are tested upon rabbits are not
- JK> staples of life and they are not needed... and sacrificing animals for
- JK> something that is not needed is illogical.
-
- JK> --Josh
-
- Well, Josh, let's look at it this way. People are going to wear
- cosmetics if it kills them. Some of the cosmetic manufactureres put in
- chemicals that could blind or even kill people in the wrong doses. I would
- rather kill animals than people, regardless of their vanity.
-
-
- ... Silver Xpress? Its tracks were washed out by a Blue Wave!
- Blue Wave/QWK v2.10
-
-
-
- --
- uucp: uunet!m2xenix!puddle!214!33!Jim.Maroon
- Internet: Jim.Maroon@f33.n214.z1.fidonet.org
-