home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky gnu.misc.discuss:4184 talk.philosophy.misc:3144 alt.society.anarchy:1002 alt.usage.english:10235
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!husc-news.harvard.edu!husc10.harvard.edu!zeleny
- From: zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu (Michael Zeleny)
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,talk.philosophy.misc,alt.society.anarchy,alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: humorous juxtaposition (was Re: Raising Funds ...)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan4.003255.18979@husc3.harvard.edu>
- Date: 4 Jan 93 05:32:54 GMT
- Article-I.D.: husc3.1993Jan4.003255.18979
- References: <1993Jan4.025624.7173@unmvax.cs.unm.edu>
- Organization: The Phallogocentric Cabal
- Lines: 73
- Nntp-Posting-Host: husc10.harvard.edu
-
- In article <1993Jan4.025624.7173@unmvax.cs.unm.edu>
- ctm@ardi.com (Clifford T. Matthews) writes:
-
- MZ:
- > "...
- >
- > I don't require jack shit, my excitable boy, with the sole
- > exception that men live up to their billing.
- >
- > ...
- >
- > cordially,
- >
- > ..."
-
- CTM:
- >The irony is subtle once you realize that there is more than one meaning of
- >"cordially." When used at the closing of a letter, it usually means
- >"warmly and genially affable." However, "cordially" also encompasses
- >"sincerely or deeply felt". It appears that we have a word, "cordially,"
- >used as a billing--describing the contents of the letter containing it--in a
- >manner that clashes with the images that the word typically conjures.
-
- I'll buy the deeply felt bit, but please try to avoid the s-word.
-
- The contemporary proliferation of bullshit also has deeper
- sources, in various forms of skepticism which deny that we can
- have any reliable access to an objective reality and which
- therefore reject the possibility of knowing how things truly
- are. These "anti-realist" doctrines undermine confidence in
- the value of disinterested efforts to determine what is true
- and what is false, and even in the intelligibility of the
- notion of objective inquiry. One response to this loss of
- confidence has been a retreat from the discipline required by
- dedication to the ideal of _correctness_ to a quite different
- sort of discipline, which is imposed by pursuit of an
- alternative ideal of _sincerity_. Rather than seeking
- primarily to arrive at accurate representations of a common
- world, the individual turns toward trying to provide honest
- representations of himself. Convinced that reality has no
- inherent nature, which he might hope to identify as the truth
- about things, he devotes himself to being true to his own
- nature. It is as though he decides that since it makes no
- sense to try to be true to the facts, he must therefore try
- instead to be true to himself.
-
- But it is preposterous to imagine that we ourselves are
- determinate, and hence susceptible both to correct and
- incorrect descriptions, while supposing that the ascription of
- determinacy to anything else has been exposed as a mistake.
- As conscious beings, we exist only in response to other
- things, and we cannot know ourselves at all without knowing
- them. Moreover, there is nothing in theory, and certainly
- nothing in experience, to support the extraordinary judgment
- that it is the truth about himself that is the easiest for a
- person to know. Facts about ourselves are not peculiarly
- solid and resistant to skeptical dissolution. Our natures
- are, indeed, elusively insubstantial -- notoriously less
- stable and less inherent than the natures of other things.
- And insofar as this is the case, sincerity itself is bullshit.
-
- Harry Frankfurt, "On Bullshit"
-
- Great essay. Changed my life. Leave sincerity to bullshitters.
-
- > --Cliff[ord T. Matthews]
- > ctm@ardi.com
-
-
- cordially,
- mikhail zeleny@husc.harvard.edu
- "Les beaulx bastisseurs nouveaulx de pierres mortes ne sont escriptz
- en mon livre de vie. Je ne bastis que pierres vives: ce sont hommes."
-