home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-tyo-news!scslwide!wsgw!wsservra!onoe
- From: eletanjm@nuscc.nus.sg (Tan Jin Meng)
- Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.x-window
- Subject: X benchmarks
- Message-ID: <1992Dec31.134200.16509@sm.sony.co.jp>
- Date: 31 Dec 92 13:42:00 GMT
- Sender: onoe@sm.sony.co.jp (Atsushi Onoe)
- Distribution: fj
- Organization: National University of Singapore
- Lines: 17
- Approved: michael@sm.sony.co.jp
-
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 04:42:49 GMT
- Message-Id: <1992Dec31.044249.29717@nuscc.nus.sg>
- Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
- Sender: xpert-request@expo.lcs.mit.edu
-
- I have a document which details some X11perf benchmarks. There is a
- composite number stated for the X11perf and a footnote which says that
- the number is derived from the
-
- "The Digital Review Methodology (5/7/90 Issue, p44)"
-
- I want to know how this number was derived. Could someone please tell me
- how?
-
- Thanks.
-
- jin meng
-