home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!charnel!rat!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!pacbell.com!rtech!ingres!rog
- From: rog@Ingres.COM (Roger Taranto)
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
- Subject: Re: Some buffer cache questions
- Message-ID: <1992Dec29.224612.14664@pony.Ingres.COM>
- Date: 29 Dec 92 22:46:12 GMT
- References: <1992Dec23.022724.27844@pony.Ingres.COM> <1992Dec23.205149.2489@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com>
- Organization: Ingres Corporation, a subsidiary of The ASK Group, Inc.
- Lines: 9
-
- In article <1992Dec23.205149.2489@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com> alan@nabeth.enet.dec.com (Alan Rollow - Alan's Home for Wayward Tumbleweeds.) writes:
- >[...] I've regularly run 128 MB systems with 25%
- >buffer caches and those have worked fine. You do have to watch how
- >you use delay_wbuffers with a large cache.
-
- So, what am I supposed to be watching the delay_wbuffers for?
-
- -Roger
- rog@ingres.com
-