home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!news.cerf.net!netlabs!lwall
- From: lwall@netlabs.com (Larry Wall)
- Subject: Re: ksh 1, perl 2 - ksh or perl for scripting?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec28.235815.21034@netlabs.com>
- Sender: news@netlabs.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: scalpel.netlabs.com
- Organization: NetLabs, Inc.
- References: <ASH.92Dec21095237@ulysses.mr.ams.com> <1992Dec23.160443.13103@crd.ge.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 23:58:15 GMT
- Lines: 9
-
- In article <1992Dec23.160443.13103@crd.ge.com> davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen) writes:
- : This is particularly true of
- : really clever perl programmers I have known, who seem to feel the need
- : to write "impressive" code instead of code which just works.
-
- You can prove anything by counting idiots.
-
- Larry Wall
- lwall@netlabs.com
-