home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!bsu-cs!bsu-ucs.uucp!00bwanderson
- From: 00bwanderson@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
- Subject: Re: Norton DiskLight 2.0
- Message-ID: <1993Jan3.053900.13365@bsu-ucs>
- Date: 3 Jan 93 10:39:00 GMT
- References: <105919@bu.edu>
- Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <105919@bu.edu>, ccmlh@buitc.bu.edu (Mark Hayes) writes:
- > I know that the original version of the Norton DiskLight was
- > supposed to be poorly coded and hazardous to your system's health.
- > I now have version 2.0, and I'm wondering, is this one OK?
- > Thanks to any who can help...
- >
- > /Mark Hayes
-
- Actually, I was shocked to discover that DL 1.x (forget what version I used)
- was bad for the system. I used it for nearly a year (until MacTools 2.0 came
- out with CP DriveLight) without it ever hurting my Classic. I used the latest
- versions of 6.0, whether .7 or .8 or .8l...never done me no harm.
-
- Now as for NDL 2.0...hmmm...I couldn't say about that for sure. I'm too happy
- with Central Point's little job...8^)
-
-
- Bruce
- --
- .sig? We don' need no steenkin' .sig!
-
- Bruce Anderson: A tradition of Chaos and Disorder since 1967
- spock@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (unix) 00bwanderson@bsu-ucs.uucp (VAX)
- Don't look at me in that tone of voice! BSU disclaims me, and I disclaim them.
-