home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / comp / sys / ibm / pc / hardware / 34197 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-25  |  1.1 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!dbr
  2. From: dbr@ocf.berkeley.edu (Daniel Rosler)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
  4. Subject: Re: Best 16-17" 1280x1024 NI monitor?
  5. Date: 25 Dec 1992 22:54:14 GMT
  6. Organization: U. C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
  7. Lines: 12
  8. Message-ID: <1hg3emINN778@agate.berkeley.edu>
  9. References: <EBROWN.92Dec22134338@bud_light.kodak.com> <sheldon.725056186@pv141b.vincent.iastate.edu> <fictorie.725212763@freyr>
  10. NNTP-Posting-Host: lightning.berkeley.edu
  11.  
  12. In article <fictorie.725212763@freyr> H.Fictorie@research.ptt.nl writes:
  13. >The 550 refreshes with 60Hz at 1280x1024, the Nanao 560 is a far better
  14. >monitor, but also more $$$ (appr. the same as the NEC 5FG).
  15.  
  16. The 5FG sells for between $1250 - $1400 and the Nanao F560i between $1750
  17. and $1900.  They are not similarly priced at all.
  18. -- 
  19.  
  20. -----------------------------------------------------------------
  21. Dan Rosler                       Internet: dbr@ocf.berkeley.edu
  22. Because you never get a third chance to make a second impression.
  23. -----------------------------------------------------------------
  24.