home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / comp / sys / ibm / pc / hardware / 33918 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-12-22  |  709 b   |  18 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!monu6!eng-b7-g15-16.eng.monash.edu.au!weiping
  3. From: weiping@eng2.eng.monash.edu.au (Weiping Hu Materials)
  4. Subject: Interlaced vs Non-interlaced monitor
  5. Message-ID: <weiping.48.724983658@eng2.eng.monash.edu.au>
  6. Lines: 7
  7. Sender: news@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Usenet system)
  8. Organization: Faculty of Engineering, Monash University 
  9. Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 00:20:58 GMT
  10.  
  11. Hi, all.  Maybe this is a naive questions to you, but it is not to me.  But 
  12. what is the difference between an interlaced and a non-interlaced monitor?  
  13. Which is better and for what reason?  A quick answer would be appreciated.
  14.  
  15. Regards,
  16.  
  17. Weiping Hu
  18.