home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!nucsrl!ddsw1!gagme!gagme!greg
- From: greg@serveme.chi.il.us (Gregory Gulik)
- Subject: Re: GCC for the 3B2 - assembly problems (was: GCC)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan1.184028.21649@serveme.chi.il.us>
- Organization: Gagme Public Access Unix, Chicago, Illinois
- References: <BzznoK.B4F@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <1992Dec30.085605.26999@phyrql.Alt.ZA>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 18:40:28 GMT
- Lines: 36
-
- In article <1992Dec30.085605.26999@phyrql.Alt.ZA> lucio@proxima.Alt.ZA writes:
- >I've already posted this, but I suspect I hung up too fast and
- >the news poster didn't complete the posting. Apologies if it
- >appears a second time...
-
- This is the only post I've seen.
-
- >Firstly, thanks to Greg Gulik (I hope I got the spelling right), for
- >the remarkable 3b2 binaries for GCC (2.3.2).
-
- You're welcome.
-
- >I _do_ however have a mild problem: the assembler finds many of the
- >generated code unpalatable (mostly invalid instructions). I guess
- >that I have a somewhat dated assembler or that I need to instruct
- >GCC to generate code with appropriate limitations for the 3B2/300
- >I am running it on (Sys V r3.1).
-
- Which version of the C compiler do you have?
- I used version 4.1 to build those binaries.
-
- >Also, I'd be keen to establish the purpose of
- > /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/3b2/2.3.2/specs
- >(a MAN page would be great) specially if it will assist with the
- >above problem.
-
- I have no idea what it is. I'm no GCC expert, I just build
- it on several systems every time there is a major improvement.
-
- -greg
-
- --
- Gregory A. Gulik Call Gagme, a public access
- greg@serveme.chi.il.us UNIX system at 312-282-8606
- || gulik@rtsg.mot.com For information, drop a note
- to info@gagme.chi.il.us
-