home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!barrett
- From: barrett@iastate.edu (Marc N. Barrett)
- Subject: Reasons for Amiga CD-ROM
- Message-ID: <Bzu958.DvD@news.iastate.edu>
- Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
- References: <n1314t@ofa123.fidonet.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 23:27:05 GMT
- Lines: 102
-
- In article <n1314t@ofa123.fidonet.org> Aric.Caley@ofa123.fidonet.org writes:
- >> Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
- >> From: barrett@iastate.edu (Marc N. Barrett)
- >> Message-ID: <Bzq75n.BA8@news.iastate.edu>
- >> Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
- >>
- >> Of course. But the miraculous thing about CD-ROM is that it makes 650M of
- >> read-only storage available for the manufacturing cost of a floppy disk.
- >
- >Wrong. 550Meg. And the manufacturing costs are comparable to floppy
- >disks, since you need to press a bunch of CD's at once whereas floppies can
- >be done a few at a time. Floppies are much easier to work with, aside from
- >their small storage capacity.
-
- There are also the usual problems with manufacturing floppies to be taken
- into consideration as well. The magnetic media of floppies is more prone to
- developing read/write errors before the disk leaves the duplicators, or
- during shipment.
-
- >I think Commodore ought to put a 20 meg floptical on high end Amigas.
-
- I've suggested that as well. Floptical drives and CD-ROM drives cost about
- the same. It is a toss-up right now which would be more beneficial in the
- short run. I think CD-ROM drives would be more beneficial in the long-run,
- at any rate.
-
- >> Of course. But CD-ROM can do wonders with a system that already has good
- >> non-interlaced resolution and color capabilities.
- >
- >Which of course the Amiga doesn't have according to you..
-
- I would prefer 800x600 non-interlaced resolution on all Amigas, including
- the low-end machines. So would the people at DataMax who developed DataTax.
- They said they would not port their IBM CD-ROM tax-preparation system to
- the Amiga until the non-interlaced resolutions are brought up to at least this
- level.
-
- >> > While I would also like to see Commodore add more CD-ROM support to the
- >> >Amiga, such third-party solutions have been available for well over a year.
- >>
- >> True, and exactly how much CD-ROM ***SOFTWARE*** has come out of this
- >> third-party CD-ROM support? Excepting CDTV titles, which I do not regard as
- >> true Amiga CD-ROM software.
- >
- >Why not? Just because counting CDTV titles would hurt your argument that
- >the Amiga has no CD-ROM support?
-
- No, because CDTV titles are junk compared to Mac CD-ROM and IBM CD-ROM
- software. CDTV titles are written for a 1M non-multitasking machine with
- a 4096-color palette, a low-res display and a 16-bit processor. Whereas Mac
- and IBM CD-ROM software (including MPC software) is written for a faster
- system with more memory, a larger palette, and a much higher resolution
- non-interlaced display.
-
- If the Amiga (not CDTV) is going to make it against Mac CD-ROM and MPC
- systems suchas the Tandy Sensation, it has to do it with Amiga CD-ROM software
- on the same level as the CD-ROM software available for the systems that the
- Amiga is competing against. ***CDTV TITLES WILL NOT CUT IT***.
-
- > And if you dont count CDTV, then why do
- >you make points about the third party solutions not fully supporting CDTV?
-
- As much as the Amiga desperately needs high-quality CD-ROM software written
- specifically for Amigas with a fast CPU, lots of memory, and a high-resolution
- non-interlaced display, CDTV titles are all that is available. In the short
- term, CDTV titles will have to be supported. Without them, all we are left
- with are the Fish and AB20 discs.
-
- >Look, maybe Amiga people just arent as gung ho about CD-ROM as people are
- >on other systems.
-
-
- Perhaps I am more visionary than anybody else. The future is CD-ROM,
- period. If the Amiga does not get its act together with CD-ROM, the most
- powerful chipsets in the world will not help it.
-
- > There ARE thrid party solutions.
-
- And what has become of them? I ask again: how much **AMIGA** (not CDTV)
- CD-ROM software is available?
-
- > Perhaps Amiga users
- >have their priorities in different areas and just don't care that much
- >about CD-ROM. Sure, a CD-ROM drive might be kinda nifty - but there is a
- >whole slew of other things I'd much rather have (large HD, floptical, AGA
- >graphics, 14.4K modem, etc).
-
- If the Amiga had its act together with respect to CD-ROM, you would not
- think so. You do not want a CD-ROM drive because there is no Amiga CD-ROM
- software available. If lots of Amiga CD-ROM software was available, of
- the same quality as Mac and MPC CD-ROM software, you would feel otherwise.
-
- >I'd like to see a CD-ROM based version of Out Of This World, with AGA
- >graphics and hi-res animation; or another similar type game like the sequel
- >to OOTW or Flashback.
-
- See? Now you're getting the idea. There are more possibilities with
- CD-ROM than without it.
-
- ---
- | Marc Barrett -MB- | email: barrett@iastate.edu
- --------------------------------------------------
-