home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU!maxtal
- From: maxtal@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (John MAX Skaller)
- Subject: Re: pointer comparisons
- Message-ID: <1993Jan1.155241.28217@ucc.su.OZ.AU>
- Sender: news@ucc.su.OZ.AU
- Nntp-Posting-Host: extro.ucc.su.oz.au
- Organization: MAXTAL P/L C/- University Computing Centre, Sydney
- References: <1992Dec27.050118.1628@lpi.liant.com> <1992Dec30.184614.5551@microsoft.com> <1992Dec31.170223.21637@lpi.liant.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 15:52:41 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <1992Dec31.170223.21637@lpi.liant.com> pkt@lpi.liant.com (Scott Turner) writes:
- > Does it govern base class subobjects? As I understand it,
- > base class subobjects are objects, and hence are covered.
-
- One consequence: abstract objects can exist.
-
- Corollary: such objects have states not accessible via
- the contiguous storage allocated for them.
- (via virtual function calls)
-
-
- --
- ;----------------------------------------------------------------------
- JOHN (MAX) SKALLER, maxtal@extro.ucc.su.oz.au
- Maxtal Pty Ltd, 6 MacKay St ASHFIELD, NSW 2131, AUSTRALIA
- ;--------------- SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING SOFTWARE ------------------
-