home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!natinst.com!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!gatech!concert!uvaarpa!gems.vcu.edu!fritz
- From: fritz@gems.vcu.edu (J. E. Fritz)
- Newsgroups: comp.specification
- Subject: Re: Theoretical limitations of algebraic specifications?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan3.125452.243@gems.vcu.edu>
- Date: 3 Jan 93 12:54:52 -0400
- References: <1992Dec31.000439.8884@gmuvax2.gmu.edu> <36.UUL1.3#8618@softrue.UUCP>
- Organization: Virginia Commonwealth University
- Lines: 36
-
- In article <36.UUL1.3#8618@softrue.UUCP>, kearns@softrue.UUCP (Steven Kearns)
- writes:
- >> I have been struggling with an algebraic spec for a couple of days and
- >> ...
- >> More specifically, I am trying to specify a tree that has the notion of
- >> a "current node", and operations to change the current node. The ....
- >> Jeff Offutt
- >> Department of ISSE, George Mason University, Fairfax VA
- >> email: ofut@gmuvax2.gmu.edu
- >> phone: (703) 993-1654 (messages: 993-1640)
- [...]
- >
- > It has been shown that Majester's stack (sp?), which is a stack with
- > a pointer to an arbitrary element (if memory serves), requires an infinite
- > set of algebraic axioms to specify.
-
- Only if you disallow auxiliary functions (functions not intended to be
- implemented).
-
- > The practical point is that algebraic specs are very poor at
- > describing objects with state. If you want to describe such an
- > object, use a model based spec language (such as Z).
-
- Could you give us a short example, say of the extended stack you mention
- above?
-
- > -steve
- >
- > ********************************************************
- > * Steven Kearns ....uunet!softrue!kearns *
- > * Software Truth softrue!kearns@uunet.uu.net *
- > ********************************************************
-
- Antediluvian newsbreak: | J. E. Fritz (fritz@ruby.vcu.edu)
- Scientists discover 4th prime; | VCU and I don't talk _to_ each other,
- proof at eleven. | let alone for each other.
-