home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.security.misc:2410 comp.org.eff.talk:8237
- Newsgroups: comp.security.misc,comp.org.eff.talk
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!charlie
- From: charlie@umnstat.stat.umn.edu (Charles Geyer)
- Subject: Re: Stupid Licenses (YUCK!)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan2.170529.24825@news2.cis.umn.edu>
- Sender: news@news2.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: isles.stat.umn.edu
- Organization: School of Statistics, University of Minnesota
- References: <bhayden.725514513@teal> <1992Dec30.130805.28123@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <bhayden.725949329@teal>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 17:05:29 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <bhayden.725514513@teal> bhayden@teal.csn.org (Bruce Hayden) writes:
-
- > Again, if the vendor did legitimate regression testing before releasing
- > the upgrade, you wouldn't have this problem.
-
- In article <1992Dec30.130805.28123@mksol.dseg.ti.com> mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com
- (fred j mccall 575-3539) replies:
-
- > Well, you wouldn't have it AS MUCH. However, from reading your
- > comments, it just doesn't seem that you've considered what kind of
- > real-world problems you're talking about.
-
- And in article <bhayden.725949329@teal> bhayden@teal.csn.org (Bruce Hayden)
- replies:
-
- > Well, I was in software development long enough (15 years) that I
- > have seen how it is done wrong more times than I can count. I have
- > also seen it done right. My experience is that all it takes to do
- > it right is proper planning and adequate resources.
-
- No doubt trying to do it right helps, but that's not enough. The vast
- majority of software suffers from Creeping Featurism or is Broken As Designed.
- No amount of "good software engineering practice" will fix that.
-
- You can't have quality software unless you put quality before featurality.
-
- --
- Charles Geyer
- School of Statistics
- University of Minnesota
- charlie@umnstat.stat.umn.edu
-