home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!sbusol.rz.uni-sb.de!coli.uni-sb.de!coli-gate.coli.uni-sb.de!spackman
- From: spackman@disco-sol.dfki.uni-sb.de (Stephen Spackman)
- Newsgroups: comp.programming
- Subject: Re: Semaphores, Swap, or Test_And_Set
- Date: 1 Jan 1993 19:06:39 GMT
- Organization: DFKI Saarbruecken GmbH, D-W 6600 Saarbruecken
- Lines: 7
- Message-ID: <SPACKMAN.93Jan1201112@disco-sol.dfki.uni-sb.de>
- References: <1992Dec22.055727.8056@nestmoi.rain.com> <1h7htbINNdg6@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- <1992Dec22.192229.17569@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
- <1h87slINNshf@rodan.UU.NET>
- Reply-To: stephen@acm.org
- NNTP-Posting-Host: disco-sol.dfki.uni-sb.de
- In-reply-to: avg@rodan.UU.NET's message of 22 Dec 1992 18:20:53 -0500
-
- Historically, the 8086 LOCK prefix did nothing but raise the external
- lock signal. Hardware engineer's option whether that means anything.
- Since then the situation has become worse, as the list of circumstances
- in which it *doesn't* work has got longer. A botch job, I think....
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- stephen p spackman stephen@acm.org
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-