home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!sumax.seattleu.edu!sumax.seattleu.edu!not-for-mail
- From: penning@sumax.seattleu.edu (Mat Penning)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
- Subject: NetBIOS vs. Named Pipes
- Date: 30 Dec 1992 23:04:04 -0800
- Organization: Seattle University
- Lines: 6
- Distribution: usa
- Message-ID: <1hu614INN16g@sumax.seattleu.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sumax.seattleu.edu
-
- I'm going to be developing an OS/2 server for DOS/Windows client
- software, and would appreciate any comments or feedback on what the
- relative advantages and disadvantages of using NetBIOS vs. Names
- Pipes might be. Of special interest is how widely supported they
- each are on different LANs, what kind of performance they have, how
- much memory they take up on the client computer, etc.
-