home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!zam103!ibt013.ibt.KFA-Juelich.de!kiehl
- From: kiehl@ibt013.ibt.KFA-Juelich.de (Horst Kiehl)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
- Subject: re: (2nd try) Does Pathworks run in OS/2?
- Message-ID: <417@zam103.zam.kfa-juelich.de>
- Date: 22 Dec 92 08:08:49 GMT
- References: <BzD6HK.DyB@inews.Intel.COM> <1992Dec22.093801.252@vulcan.resmel.bhp.com.au>
- Sender: news@zam103.zam.kfa-juelich.de
- Reply-To: kiehl@ibt013.ibt.KFA-Juelich.de (Horst Kiehl)
- Organization: Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH (KFA), Germany
- Lines: 16
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ibt013
-
- In article <1992Dec22.093801.252@vulcan.resmel.bhp.com.au>,
- paulg@a1.resmel.bhp.com.au (Paul Gallagher) writes:
-
- >In article <BzD6HK.DyB@inews.Intel.COM> crichmon@sedona.intel.com (Chris Richmond) writes:
- >>
- >>Does DEC's Pathworks (for Windows) run in/on/under OS/2 2.0?
-
- >No. Although I've believe you can get Pathworks for DOS to run
- >in a DOS image, it will not operate correctly (without patching)
- >in a standard VDM.
-
- DEC's PATHWORKS does run in a DOS image. WIN-OS/2 also runs in a DOS
- image, so there's a chance that PATHWORKS for Windows runs in WIN-OS/2
- in a DOS image.
-
- Horst
-