home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!hamblin.math.byu.edu!yvax.byu.edu!cunyvm!i18bc
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: OS/2 2.1? (Why it may cost) READ THIS!!
- Message-ID: <92363.001401I18BC@CUNYVM.BITNET>
- From: CUNY/Spartacus <I18BC@CUNYVM.BITNET>
- Date: Monday, 28 Dec 1992 00:14:01 EST
- References: <62740@mimsy.umd.edu> <1992Dec14.094803.12759@waikato.ac.nz><OLAVT.92Dec140031
- 46@ulrik.uio.no><1992Dec14.175627.4452@unixland.natick.ma.us><OLAVT.92Dec15012734@ulrik.uio.no>
- Organization: City University of New York/ University Computer Center
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <OLAVT.92Dec15012734@ulrik.uio.no>, olavt@ulrik.uio.no (Olav Torvund)
- says:
- >And I do not think that many users are really waiting for NT. They are
- >curious, but that does not mean that they will buy it. And for us OS/2
- >users, OS/2 is definitly not an in-between OS on our way to NT.
- >
- >Olav Torvund
- >
-
- Hm, I don't think so either. Iately I've noticed a change in
- attitude between some of the computer people I come in contact
- with everyday. Not to long ago I had CIS people tell me I
- was nuts to go with OS/2, NT would be the new standard and
- OS/2 wasn't even in their vocabulary. Today those same people
- are asking me questions about OS/2 and reading these newsgroups :)
- Its kind of nice to say to some of the arrogant ones
- at our school, "I told you so. nyah nyah nyah :)"
-
- Hmm, actually its not over yet. IBM, please don't let us down!
- -------
- . . . . . . . .
- ------------------------------+ All The Best in '93,. . . . . * . . . .
- Reply To: | Merry Christmas! . . . . /oπ . . . . .
- I18BC@CunyVM.Cuny.Edu | Edward Galarza, . . / o π . .
- I18BC@CunyVM.BitNet | Brooklyn College Of The . /o o π . .
- IRC: Spartacus | City University Of New York /o o o π . .
- ------------------------------+ "Que viva el OS/2!" __________| |__________
- #######################
-