home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!princeton!phoenix.Princeton.EDU!bathurst
- From: bathurst@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Bruce Bathurst)
- Subject: Re: IBM XT upgrade
- Message-ID: <1993Jan3.162939.4316@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Keywords: XT
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: phoenix.princeton.edu
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <50921@shamash.cdc.com> <1993Jan3.144052.13547@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 16:29:39 GMT
- Lines: 50
-
- In article <1993Jan3.144052.13547@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- istuart@nyx.cs.du.edu (Ian Stuart) writes:
-
- >In article <50921@shamash.cdc.com> slc@a2.cim.cdc.com
- >(Steve Chesney x4662) writes:
-
- >>Since she is used to our 386, it seems slow to her. Are there any cheap and
- >>simple upgrades that we could try to alleviate this?
-
- [SNIP, SNIP]
-
- >Unfortunatly there is no way to make any real improvements to an XT,
- >without spending enough money to buy another computer.
-
- This is true of those who keep their computers in tune. It's
- remarkable how often I hear the following: "My computer was really
- fast when I first got it; but now it's terribly slow. I guess it's
- time to upgrade the processor to an 80-blip-86?" (These people did
- not even buy Windows.)
-
- Two people I know have old 8 Mhz 80286 AT clones and bought 1992
- software. Grrrind..faaalicck, faaalick, faaalick scrolled the screen.
-
- The first machine had only 640K of memory, and LotusWorks wouldn't
- even load. When it finally did, and the disk was defragmented, Lotus
- scrolled like a hog leaping in slow motion. DR-DOS then placed every
- driver and TSR into upper memory (including in an unused part of video
- RAM). After a careful tuning, he has a disk cache, video accelerator,
- screen saver, printer buffer, and task swapper active. LotusWorks
- zips along, and it and other large programs swap in and out instantly.
- The machine has never crashed. When 2 Mb of extended memory was added
- (1 Mb configured as XMS swap space), no improvement was noted.
-
- The other AT surely has the world's slowest hard drive (it has to be
- the largest), but ran a disk-intensive program last night faster than
- a new and untuned 40 Mhz 80386 machine with a 200 Mb. disk and 8 Mb of
- memory.
-
- (Oh, yes...I vouch for the accuracy of the above, and give my cat
- Buffy as an impartial witness.)
-
- My point is that those improvements suggested by Mr. Cheny could make
- a great difference when combined. Computers, like cars, should be
- carefully tuned when new and kept that way.
-
- Bruce (Gypsy Scholar)
- --
- Department of Geological and Geophysical Sciences
- Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
- bathurst@phoenix.princeton.edu bathurst@pucc.bitnet !princeton!phoenix!bathurst
-