home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!qiclab!leonard
- From: leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Leonard Erickson)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
- Subject: Re: IBM XT upgrade
- Keywords: XT
- Message-ID: <1992Dec31.124152.8371@qiclab.scn.rain.com>
- Date: 31 Dec 92 12:41:52 GMT
- Article-I.D.: qiclab.1992Dec31.124152.8371
- References: <50921@shamash.cdc.com>
- Reply-To: Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org
- Organization: SCN Research/Qic Laboratories of Tigard, Oregon.
- Lines: 35
-
- slc@a2.cim.cdc.com (Steve Chesney x4662) writes:
-
- >At my wife's job (a church) she is obligated to use a vintage IBM XT with
- >a 10 meg hard disk, color display and IBM PC-DOS 2.10.
- >Since she is used to our 386, it seems slow to her. Are there any cheap and
- >simple upgrades that we could try to alleviate this? I am considering:
-
- >upgrade to MS-DOS 5.0
-
- Using anything past DOS 3.31 on an XT is just a waste of RAM. There's
- nothing that DOS 5 can do on an XT that DOS 3.31 can't. And 3.31 uses
- *noticeably* less RAM.
-
- >use of a disk cache
-
- Without an EMS board there's nowhere to *put* the cache except in
- the 640k that everything else is trying to use. So you'd increase the
- performance at the cost of breaking any RAM hungry software!
-
- >Any other ideas?
-
- Shop around for an old EMS board. There are a lot of 8-bit only ones that
- won't run at anything above 8 MHz bus speed. They're often available for
- under $20 (without ram, but then the 256k chips (or even 64k!!) thery use
- are *very* cheap)
-
- Adding one will give a place for many programs to swap to, and allow you
- to have things like a cache. The swapping will make a *major* performance
- difference to any program that can use the EMS!
-
- --
- Leonard Erickson leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com
- CIS: [70465,203] 70465.203@compuserve.com
- FIDO: 1:105/51 Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org
- (The CIS & Fido addresses are preferred)
-