home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!yale!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!ai-lab!hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu!mycroft
- From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: GCC and reliability
- Date: 1 Jan 1993 14:57:18 GMT
- Organization: /etc/organization
- Lines: 17
- Message-ID: <1i1m4eINN9gu@life.ai.mit.edu>
- References: <C026pE.Cus@mach1.wlu.ca>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu
-
-
- In article <C026pE.Cus@mach1.wlu.ca> kfisher3@mach1.wlu.ca (kevin
- fisher U) writes:
- >
- > Ok, after reading a number of posts, and experiencing my own
- > frustrations with GCC, I have this question: is GCC stable enough to
- > use for "serious" (TM) programming, or learing something, like C++?
-
- GCC 2 is considered to be in beta test. If you find bugs, you are
- welcome to send bug reports to `bug-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu' or
- `bug-g++@prep.ai.mit.edu', but whining about it is unlikely to
- accomplish anything.
-
- --
- \ / Charles Hannum, mycroft@ai.mit.edu
- /\ \ PGP public key available on request. MIME, AMS, NextMail accepted.
- Scheme White heterosexual atheist male (WHAM) pride!
-