home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / comp / os / linux / 22345 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-01  |  983 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!serval!luke.eecs.wsu.edu!hlu
  2. From: hlu@luke.eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
  4. Subject: Re: gcc 2.3.3
  5. Message-ID: <1993Jan1.072316.17647@serval.net.wsu.edu>
  6. Date: 1 Jan 93 07:23:16 GMT
  7. Article-I.D.: serval.1993Jan1.072316.17647
  8. References: <1hr66bINNt25@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU> <1992Dec31.000117.5907@serval.net.wsu.edu> <BKUHN.92Dec31203334@cs.loyola.edu>
  9. Sender: news@serval.net.wsu.edu (USENET News System)
  10. Organization: Washington State University!
  11. Lines: 18
  12.  
  13. In article <BKUHN.92Dec31203334@cs.loyola.edu> bkuhn@cs.loyola.edu (Bradley " b " Kuhn) writes:
  14. >
  15. >>   gcc 2.3.3 (386/486) is on tsx-11 under pub/linux/GCC.
  16. >
  17. >What is the advantage of 2.3.3 over 2.2.2d?  Is it worth going through
  18.  
  19. Bug fixes and code improvements. If you use g++, get it.
  20.  
  21. >the trouble of getting it?  Also, would one have to recompile all
  22. >programs that used dynmic linking?
  23. >
  24.  
  25. No. I didn't.
  26.  
  27. >
  28. >
  29.  
  30. H.J.
  31.