home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.object
- Path: sparky!uunet!mole-end!mat
- From: mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us
- Subject: Re: A little glossary for objects
- Message-ID: <1992Dec27.210436.122@mole-end.matawan.nj.us>
- Summary: I correct myself ...
- Organization: :
- References: <knight.724948496@cunews> <1992Dec27.014406.26583@mole-end.matawan.nj.us>
- Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 21:04:36 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- I inadvertently chopped out two lines from my followup ...
-
- In article <1992Dec27.014406.26583@mole-end.matawan.nj.us>, mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us writes:
- > In article <1992Dec23.151238.3419@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE>, rumpe@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Bernhard Rumpe) writes:
-
- >> VALUE
- >>
- >> A value is a value is a value.
-
- > Forgive me for smiling. In my forthcoming C++ book, I found myself forced
- > to write something like this:
- >
- > ``A value is harder to define, but we usually know it when
- >
-
- ``A value is harder to define, but we usually know it when
- we see it--in fact a value is what we see when we look at an
- object or an expression.''
-
-
- ``You would know him if
- you saw him, for his eyes
- are sunken in.''--T.S.Eliot
- --
- (This man's opinions are his own.)
- From mole-end Mark Terribile
-
- mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us, Somewhere in Matawan, NJ
-