home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!monymsys!sonyd1.Broadcast.Sony.COM!blilly.UUCP!bruce
- From: bruce@blilly.UUCP (Bruce Lilly)
- Subject: Re: The UUCP network hasn't a tree structure (for some strange unexplained reason, was Re: Mixed format addresses)
- References: <KEQPrAmGBh107h@boombox.apana.org.au> <1992Dec28.024259.14707@blilly.UUCP> <1993Jan2.055818.25540@jack.sns.com>
- Organization: Bruce Lilly
- Date: Sat, 2 Jan 93 21:40:48 GMT
- Message-ID: <1993Jan2.214048.4207@blilly.UUCP>
- Reply-To: lilb@sony.compuserve.com (Bruce Lilly)
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <1993Jan2.055818.25540@jack.sns.com>,
- posted to comp.mail.uucp,
- steve@jack.sns.com (J. Steven Harrison) wrote:
- >In article <1992Dec28.024259.14707@blilly.UUCP> lilb@sony.compuserve.com (Bruce Lilly) writes:
- >>In article <KEQPrAmGBh107h@boombox.apana.org.au> David.Keegel@apana.org.au wrote:
- >>> Personally, I don't want to update a file every time
- >>>my feed adds another site, I just want to send everything to my feed.
- >>>If they don't recognise it, they do the same (as long as there is a
- >>>"tree" structure, and each node knows all the sites "below" it).
- >>
- >>What makes you think the UUCP network has a tree structure?
- >
- >Come on now Bruce have you ever heard of DNS?
-
- Of course I have. But it has no relation to routing of mail messages
- via UUCP protocol over a point-to-point physical network using serial links.
-
- You did *read* Keegel's article, didn't you?
-
- --
- Bruce Lilly blilly!bruce@Broadcast.Sony.COM
- ...uunet!sonyusa!sonyd1!blilly!bruce
-