home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!gatech!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!fornax!jamie
- From: jamie@cs.sfu.ca (Jamie Andrews)
- Subject: Re: Occurs check (really constraints)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.010930.2892@cs.sfu.ca>
- Organization: CSS, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
- References: <1992Dec21.153147.26177@cs.brown.edu> <TORKEL.92Dec21175440@bast.sics.se> <1992Dec21.195646.3776@cs.brown.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 01:09:30 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Dec21.195646.3776@cs.brown.edu> mj@cs.brown.edu (Mark Johnson) writes:
- |P.S. I'm interested in this approach. I know of work by
- |Hoefeld and Smolka ``Definite Relations over Constraint Languages'',
- |and Chen and D.S. Warren ``C-Logic of Complex Objects'' and
- |``Abductive Logic Programming'' that describe the decomposition
- |into a relational and constraint components. Any other pointers
- |to relevant literature?
-
- One other I know of is "Constraint Simplification Rules",
- by Thom Fruehwirth (thom@ecrc.de), ECRC tech report 92-18.
- He describes a framework of delay declarations and special
- clause-like rules which are used by the system to store and
- simplify constraints. It looks like a very general system.
-
- --Jamie.
- jamie@cs.sfu.ca
- "The Tao's net encompasses the whole universe." - tao te ching
-