home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!gatech!emory!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!erc
- From: erc@netcom.com (Eric Smith)
- Subject: Re: template disappointments ... (suggestions?)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec31.150138.22342@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
- References: <24508@alice.att.com> <1hqnd6INNe83@agate.berkeley.edu> <1992Dec30.173230.22878@taumet.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 15:01:38 GMT
- Lines: 8
-
- In article <1992Dec30.173230.22878@taumet.com> steve@taumet.com (Steve Clamage) writes:
- >In a template instantiation, the 'int' argument might be any expression,
- >including one containing right shifts. If you try to allow what appears
- >to be a right shift to be two closing ">" instead, you wind up with
- >nondeterministic lexing/parsing, ambiguous grammars, or context-sensitive
-
- How is >> different from > in that respect? a>b is a perfectly valid
- int expression.
-