home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf.sub.org!ppcnet!sks!mcd!mips.ruessel.sub.org!naddy
- From: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org (Christian Weisgerber)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Message-ID: <H.eg.mWkOTLb_pnw@mips.ruessel.sub.org>
- Organization: My Individual Private Site
- Subject: Re: Bandwidth of HST and V.32bis
- References: <1992Dec28.052058.5016@csie.nctu.edu.tw>
- Reply-To: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org
- X-Software: HERMES GUS 1.10 Rev. Dec 18 1992
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 23:01:30 CET
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Lines: 22
-
- In <1992Dec28.052058.5016@csie.nctu.edu.tw>, Yeng-Chee Su writes:
-
- > Does anyone know the bandwidth of HST and V.32bis? As I know, the V.32bis
- > is 600Hz - 3KHz but what's the HST?
-
- HST uses the same bandwidth as V.32bis for its main channel,
- additionally there's a 450bps back channel at 375Hz. Sorry, I don't know
- it's symbol rate. Could be 75bd. (Anybody know?)
-
- > I'm finding why the HST is doing better than V.32bis in most
- > situation(worse line). Is the bandwidth narrow than V.32bis? If not,
- > why?
-
- They use pretty much the same bandwidth, however V.32bis uses it twice,
- as both channels occupy the same bandwidth. The modem has to subtract
- the signal it just sent from what it receives. I'm not into digital
- signal processing but obviously this is difficult to accomplish. V.32bis
- modems rather easily get out of sync and have to retrain or drop carrier
- altogether.
-
- --
- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber, Germany naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org
-