home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!NIU.BITNET!U21DLS1
- Message-ID: <QUALRS-L%92122113001512@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 11:59:00 CST
- Sender: Qualitative Research for the Human Sciences <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
- From: U21DLS1@NIU.BITNET
- Subject: Re: Advice on reliability
- Lines: 9
-
- If you need "objective proof" of coding and data analysis, then
- why aren't you using quantitive methods? If you derive insights
- from your interviews which could allow readers of your insights
- to gain further insights, then isn't that enough? I understand
- your desire to be considered legitimate "researchers" rather
- than poets, but perhaps it is time to think about the
- ways poets "code their data" to make us more aware of the
- worlds around us. -- just some food for thoughts --
- Peace, Debbie Smith-Shank u21dls1@niu (art department)
-