home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!paladin.american.edu!auvm!DOES1.BITNET!U7636JI
- Message-ID: <MIDEUR-L%92123110462213@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mideur-l
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 10:43:42 EST
- Sender: Discussion of Middle Europe topics <MIDEUR-L@UBVM.BITNET>
- Comments: Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2
- From: James Sheldon <U7636JI@DOES1.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: More books and films
- In-Reply-To: note of 12/30/92 21:37
- Lines: 16
-
- Actually, the reason many UN efforts have been unsuccessful is the fact that th
- e deployed military elements operate under constraints more akin to the police
- paradigm than the military one. In most instances, they've specifically been p
- rohibited from taking any offensive action, and almost no defensive action. Th
- e situation in Bosnia/Serbia/etc. is markedly distinct from that in Somalia. T
- he Serb "chetniks" are a bonafide military force with significant firepower who
- have a history of fighting successfully as guerrillas/partisans. As I noted in
- a previous reply on this issue, most military experts, including the former UN
- Force commanding general from Canada, have assessed the manpower requirements t
- o successfully execute a military operation in Bosnia at a level so high that m
- ost UN members would find the costs, political and economic, to be unacceptable
- The force size we're talking about would be on a par with that deployed for
- Desert Storm and fighting on terrain significantly more difficult to negotiate
- than the Iraq/Kuwait desert. If the full miltary option were adopted, would
- the UN have the fortitude to hold Serbian population centers as hostages or tar
- gets of air strikes, etc.? Uncle Ernie
-