home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SNYSYRV1.BITNET!KINGH
- Original_To: BITNET%"MEDLIB-L@UBVM.BITNET"
- Original_cc: KINGH
- Message-ID: <MEDLIB-L%92123010215257@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.medlib-l
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 10:20:00 EDT
- Sender: Medical Libraries Discussion List <MEDLIB-L@UBVM.BITNET>
- From: KINGH@SNYSYRV1.BITNET
- Subject: Re: Medical spellchecker (and MeSH)
- Lines: 9
-
- I am often tempted to use the MeSH headings for definitions BUT few are
- aware of their source. Therefore, I feel that using Stedman's, Dorland's
- etc. is more acceptable for definitions than using MeSH scopenotes because
- the dictionaries are considered reputable and authoritative.
-
- Hannah
- SUNY HSC Library at Syracuse
- kingh@snysyrv1
- kingh@vax.cs.hscsyr.edu
-