home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!ASUACAD.BITNET!IACDES
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Message-ID: <01GSXJPYN8IQ96VNR6@asu.edu>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mbu-l
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 15:23:56 -0700
- Sender: "Megabyte University (Computers & Writing)" <MBU-L@TTUVM1.BITNET>
- From: "David E. Schwalm" <IACDES@ASUACAD.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: Standardizing
- In-Reply-To: note of 12/30/92 14:59
- Lines: 23
-
- Eric, we have encouraged but not required collaboration among the TAs in
- teaching, grading, lesson planning etc., but I have found them strangely
- resistant to the idea (just as students often resist group work). There are
- certain advantages to it, but it also requires structuring of more time for
- meeting with collaborators, grading sessions, etc. Also, novice teachers are
- often afraid to have someone else in the classroom with them for fear someone
- will see them screw up. One thrust of our TA (how about "acculturation"
- instead of "training"?) acculturation program is get TAs used to having
- someone in the room other than their students so that they won't panic at some
- future time when "evaluators" show up, so that they will be willing to welcome
- the next batch of new TAs into their classrooms. This is a tough fight. We
- have a "peer coaching" program in which TAs visit each other's classes a
- couple three times a semester and record their observations (not judgments) of
- what went on and share those observations privately with the host teacher.
- This is pretty benign, but it creates a lotof anxiety. As part of our general
- educational acculturation to "rugged individualism," (both as students and
- teachers), team teaching or other kinds of collaboration is seen as 1)
- threatening and 2) time consuming.
-
- -- David E. Schwalm, Assoc. Provost for Academic Programs
- ___Arizona State University West
- ___4701 West Thunderbird Rd.
- ___Phoenix, AZ 85069-7100___(602) 543-4500
-