home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!paladin.american.edu!auvm!VAXF.COLORADO.EDU!POWERS_W
- X-Envelope-to: CSG-L@vmd.cso.uiuc.edu
- X-VMS-To: @CSG
- MIME-version: 1.0
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Message-ID: <01GSOT45GQCY006MJF@VAXF.COLORADO.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.csg-l
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 09:16:19 -0700
- Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSG-L@UIUCVMD.BITNET>
- From: "William T. Powers" <POWERS_W%FLC@VAXF.COLORADO.EDU>
- Subject: Misc. blah
- Lines: 63
-
- [From Bill Powers (921224.0845)]
-
- Martin Taylor, Rick Marken
-
- That's nice, don't fight.
-
- It occurs to me that anyone who refuses to buy into your system
- is a considered a fanatic relative to whatever that person does
- buy into.
-
- A reliable mark of a true fanatic is a complete lack of a sense
- of humor.
-
- Remember: YOU are a fanatic. I am steadfast.
- --------------------------------------------------------------
- RE a private post:
-
- Netters with Macs will be delighted to know that Martin's
- associate Chris Love is rewriting the Primer Series for Macs. The
- result, Martin say, will be put on Bill Silvert's server some
- time soon. I'll be adding to that series in January. Others are
- welcome to contribute "chapters" that make specific points.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
- To all who felt that my "armchair" complaint was somewhat
- unreasonable:
-
- Well, it is unreasonable to ask people who are out in the world
- of applications to turn into basic researchers. In my post to
- Gary yesterday I tried to indicate what such people can do to
- TEST the theory every time it's applied. Figure out what the
- theory says SHOULD happen, and see what DOES happen.
-
- I guess I'm asking people not to use PCT simply as another way of
- talking about behavior after the fact, another form of
- interpretation. If there is anything to PCT, it will stand up
- under tough scrutiny. If someone comes up with a criticism of
- PCT, the last thing you should do is defend it. That person might
- be right. What you need to do is find out if the criticism holds
- up. Don't be afraid to make predictions using PCT. Whether they
- work out or not, you'll learn something. When they work, you'll
- get a new jolt of confidence. When they don't, you'll discover,
- perhaps, something you hadn't understood about PCT, or you may
- discover something really wrong with the theory which we all
- would be grateful to know about. If you don't defend the theory
- you'll have nothing to lose however the tests come out.
-
- One of our great difficulties with conventional science is the
- prevalence of devoutly held beliefs that scientists defend as if
- they've taken vows of loyalty to whatever subject they know the
- most about. This means that any suggestion that their own theory
- is wrong arouses an instant defense regardless of the merits of
- the suggestion. If humanly possible, we should avoid putting that
- kind of face on PCT. One way to do this is to treat the
- interpretations of PCT as if they have to prove themselves anew
- every time they're applied. Don't use easy tests; use HARD tests.
- You can do this even if you're not doing basic research.
- -------------------------------------------------------------
- Waiting for the rest of the offspring to arrive for a Christmas
- visit. It's possible that I may skip replying to posts tomorrow!
- --------------------------------------------------------------
- Best to all. Better times ahead.
-
- Bill P.
-