home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!vms.csd.mu.edu!1012BREUCKMA
- From: 1012breuckma@vms.csd.mu.edu
- Newsgroups: alt.wolves
- Subject: wolf summit
- Date: 22 Dec 1992 14:26:30 GMT
- Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
- Lines: 49
- Message-ID: <0096575B.B99FDAA0@vms.csd.mu.edu>
- Reply-To: 1012breuckma@vms.csd.mu.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsd.csd.mu.edu
-
- ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) -- A state plan to kill at least 300 wolves
- has been postponed, but a public relations battle goes on with
- information that skirts the bounds of accuracy.
- Two national animal-rights groups have been running ads in
- newspapers nationwide arguing against the plan for an aerial wolf
- kill and promoting tourism boycotts of Alaska.
- One activist said his group's ad is "intentionally vague," while
- the other argued that any flaws need to be measured against the
- rightmindedness of the overall message.
- Earlier this month, Gov. Walter J. Hickel, inundated with phone
- calls and letters opposing the plan, shelved it pending a "wolf
- summit" beginning Jan. 16.
- State biologists hope that reducing the number of wolves in two
- areas of the eastern interior region will boost populations of moose
- and caribou, two game species popular with hunters and wolves.
- The gray wolf is extinct or endangered in most of the Lower 48
- states, but a healthy population of more than 6,000 wolves thrives in
- Alaska.
- An ad by the New York-based Fund for Animals says, "Most
- outrageous of all, much of (the shooting) will take place on your
- federal lands."
- But the vast majority of the action is planned for state lands,
- and Wayne Pacelle, the fund's national director, said he knows that.
- "It is not a majority of federal land, and we were careful not to
- say that it was a majority," he said from his office in Silver
- Spring, Md. "The wording is intentionally vague."
- The quarter-page ad, which cost $15,000 each run, was scheduled to
- appear in the Los Angeles Times for a third time on Tuesday. It
- appeared last week in The New York Times and The Washington Times.
- Pacelle said Alaska's size provided some leeway in phrasing the
- ad. While the two areas targeted for wolf control comprise about 3
- percent of Alaska, "'For people in Connecticut or Massachusetts or
- Maryland, even what's considered a small percentage in Alaska is
- substantial," he said.
- "We certainly stand by the full message of the ad -- an aerial
- slaughter of wolves is going to take place. And we believe a lot of
- wolves that spend time on federal land are going to be killed."
- The group Friends of Animals, based in Norwalk, Conn., ran an ad
- in USA Today that referred to a "huge" portion of wilderness subject
- to wolf control and said: "(Wolf shooting) would be aimed at
- artificially inflating herds of moose and caribou -- which already
- number over a million -- to create a 'wildlife spectacle' attractive
- to hunters and tourists."
- While the state estimates of the overall moose and caribou
- populations run about 1 million, Bruce Bartley, a Fish and Game
- spokesman, said half of that is made up of the remote and virtually
- inaccessible Western Arctic caribou herd.
-
-
-