home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!gtoal
- From: gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal)
- Subject: Re: Sexist hypocrites
- Message-ID: <Bzqv7p.6Fn@demon.co.uk>
- Sender: news@demon.co.uk
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pizzabox.demon.co.uk
- Organization: Cuddlehogs Anonymous
- References: <92358.155839HERSCH@auvm.american.edu>
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 03:33:24 GMT
- Lines: 9
-
- In article <92358.155839HERSCH@auvm.american.edu> HERSCH@auvm.american.edu writes:
- :Many hundreds of years ago, the word "woman" evolved from "wif"
- :and "man", the latter word at the time carrying no gender information.
-
- Sounds plausible to me. Didn't wyf-man go hand-in-hand with wer-man or
- some such masculine form? man certainly meant then what mankind means
- now.
-
- G
-