home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.tek.com!tekig7!tekig5!briand
- From: briand@tekig5.pen.tek.com (Brian D Diehm)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Meaning? What meaning?
- Message-ID: <8064@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM>
- Date: 22 Dec 92 18:34:32 GMT
- References: <92357.121648HERSCH@auvm.american.edu>
- Sender: news@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM
- Reply-To: briand@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM
- Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR.
- Lines: 29
-
- >Gee, four totally different definitions for "shit-eating grin".
- >Maybe it doesn't really mean anything in particular? Effective
- >communication with this expression would seem dicey at best.
- >
- >Herschel Browne
- >"The" American University
-
- This is really pretty interesting. As "linguists" we want to think that the
- words carry the meaning. But the existence of such expressions, expressions
- that mean whatever the speaker wants them to mean, belie that theory.
-
- Shakespeare used this tool a lot (we think): coined expressions that convey
- their meaning by usage and implication alone. Being coined and thus never
- before heard, they cannot convey meaning precisely.
-
- It's akin to that satisfying "thunk" you feel when you first hear an expression
- that you'd never think up yourself, but you just *know* what it means because
- you wish you *had* thought it up yourself.
-
- So, perhaps, Herschel's worry that effective communication is at risk isn't
- such a worry after all; the expression carries its own meaning so well that
- the listener understands the intended concept precisely.
-
- The science of onomatopoetics?
- --
- Brian Diehm
- Tektronix, Inc. (503) 627-3437 briand@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM
- P.O. Box 500, M/S 19-286
- Beaverton, OR 97077
-