home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!princeton!crux!mikulska
- From: mikulska@crux.Princeton.EDU (Margaret Mikulska)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: Sexist language
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.231008.1465@Princeton.EDU>
- Date: 21 Dec 92 23:10:08 GMT
- References: <1992Dec17.150052.10887@vax.oxford.ac.uk> <BzJMLp.84o@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> <8040@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM>
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Reply-To: mikulska@astro.princeton.edu (Margaret Mikulska)
- Organization: Princeton University
- Lines: 15
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crux.princeton.edu
-
- In article <8040@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM> briand@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM writes:
- >
- >Mandar, save this humble acceptance shit for Chaucer. Anything after that is
- >merely a corruption.
- >
- >Why Chaucer, you ask? Why not earlier? Well, Mandar, it's arbitrary. Chaucer
- >was about the earliest of the evolution of our languages that is generally
- >agreed on as recognizable modern English.
- ^^^^^^
- Excuse me, but Chaucer's English is an example of _Middle_ English.
- _Modern_ English is later - starting around something like 16th C or so.
- Maybe a bit earlier, but definitely after Chaucer.
-
-
- -Margaret
-