home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!hersch
- Organization: The American University - University Computing Center
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 16:04:49 EST
- From: <HERSCH@auvm.american.edu>
- Message-ID: <92366.160449HERSCH@auvm.american.edu>
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: Apostrophe's - one more time
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <C04pvE.FvE@world.std.com>, jcf@world.std.com (Joseph C Fineman)
- says:
- >
- >jww@evolving.com (John W. Woolley) writes:
- >
- >>"National Review" uses the rule, better to my mind, that you write
- >>another "s" only when you pronounce another "s". Jones's car, Max's
- >>bike, France's burden, Arkansas's (!) governor; but Goebbels' lies,
- >>Dickens' novels, King Charles' head.
- >
- >For me, that rule would be the same as the Chicago Manual's, because I
- >pronounce the extra syllable on *all* the examples you give.
-
- And what about the Court of St. James's, nearly always so spelt,
- very rarely with the extra syllable pronounced? (At least, that's
- my impression from my perspective on the left side of the Atlantic.)
- As for the examples above, I would certainly say King Charles's
- head, would probably say and write "Dickens novels" with Dickens
- as an ordinary adjective, unless the possessive were unavoidable,
- when I'd probably say "his", having firmly established who "he"
- is. "Goebbels's" sounds kind of silly though, doesn't it?
-
- H.
-
- Herschel Browne
- "The" American University
-