home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!apple!netcomsv!netcom.com!sue
- From: sue@netcom.com (Sue Miller)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: Sexist hypocrites
- Message-ID: <1992Dec29.192539.8424@netcom.com>
- Date: 29 Dec 92 19:25:39 GMT
- References: <BzMxsK.HnF@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> <38070@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu>
- Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <38070@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu> djohns@elm.circa.ufl.edu (David A. Johns) writes:
- >In article <BzMxsK.HnF@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> mmmirash@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu (Mandar M. Mirashi) writes:
- >
- ># The word "woman" comes from "man". (wif-man or literally "wife of
- ># man")
- >
- >Sigh.
- >
- >Now to your ignorance of language in general, and the English
- >language, and England, and the BBC, and the queen, we must add your
- >ignorance of Old English (aka Anglo-Saxon).
- >
- >Since "wif" meant "woman", and "man" meant "person", "wif-man" meant
- >"woman-person". "Wife of man" would be something like "weras wif".
- >
-
- I'm just trying to follow this, so don't anyone think I'm working
- an agenda here. It doesn't make sense to me to have "wif-man"
- mean "woman-person". Woman to me means "female human", and I
- imagined that "wif-man" meant the same thing. In other words,
- wouldn't "wif" just equate to "female", and not "woman"?
-
- Just curious.
-