home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!rochester!cornell!uw-beaver!news.u.washington.edu!stein.u.washington.edu!lukoff
- From: lukoff@stein.u.washington.edu (Fred Lukoff)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: Sexist hypocrites
- Message-ID: <1hnr3hINNga1@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- Date: 28 Dec 92 21:20:49 GMT
- References: <38052@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu> <1992Dec27.174634.18263@u.washington.edu> <1992Dec28.002401.1938@ra.msstate.edu>
- Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
- Lines: 50
- NNTP-Posting-Host: stein.u.washington.edu
-
- In article <1992Dec28.002401.1938@ra.msstate.edu> wkl1@Ra.MsState.Edu (Wing-Keong Loke the consummate chronic prevaricator) writes:
- >In article <1992Dec27.174634.18263@u.washington.edu> lukoff@carson.u.washington.edu (Fred Lukoff) writes:
- >>
- >>Sure, the suffix may seem like the words make men the norm and women
- >>'deviant', but what are we then to do, make up words like 'waitron'?
- >>Or make up words than end in -person? I actually saw a Washington State
- >>government notice for 'fisherperson' licenses and nearly died. So does
- >>anyone have any suggestions as to how we can fix this situation, BESIDES
- >>-person words?
- >>
- >>Ben Lukoff
- >
- > How you reacted to the word "fisherperson" is exactly how many
- >women feel about the suffix "man." Anyway, why is "fisherperson" so
- >revolting to you? Other than it sounding funny, does it make you feel
- >less of a person? Consider "fisherMEN" instead. For a female, there
- >might be some feelings of dissatisfaction based on the inability to
- >identify with the "masculine" suffix. More importantly, attempts to
- >change it to a gender neutral word is met with resistance by some
- >people, which makes it seem more concrete tha males have it better.
- > The problem of wording has a whole lot to do with how one
- >feels. It's also important to take notice that, for an example,a
- >spouse generally makes concessions to the other spouse as a show of
- >affection and caring, similarly, an inability to make concessions
- >on the part of males could be interpreted as not caring or giving a
- >damn. The result of this might be the rise of radical feminism or
- >intolerance on the part of females when dealing with traditional
- >male structures of whatever (discourse, decision making, etc.)
-
- "Fisherperson" certainly does not make me feel less of a person. One, it
- sounds funny, as you said. Two, it is made up, and is not a natural
- construct. I don't know who previously referred in this group to
- "linguistic engineering" but that is a perfect example. I have said that
- the most sexist person in the world can use the most politically correct
- language in the world, and the least sexist can use the least PC, and what
- words you use do not necessarily show how you think. -Men is *not* a
- masculine suffix. Sure, the primary meaning of the word 'man' *is* male
- human being, but the suffix means human. Perhaps it is the inability of
- people to deal with this fact....
- "Attempts to ***change*** it to a gender neutral word is met with
- resistance by some people"...Who can "change" the language? As long as
- most people object to a change, it will not go forward. If you truly want
- to change the prejudiced society we live in you must educate first, and
- the language will follow. You're going about it completely backwards.
- Besides, we will end up with words such as 'ombudsperson', which used to
- be 'ombudsman', which is a direct steal from Swedish, so the -man suffix
- isn't the same English -man suffix you people object to.
- While I'm on this, any thoughts on 'waitron' or 'womyn'? :)
-
- Ben Lukoff
-