home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!tulane!uflorida!elm.circa.ufl.edu!djohns
- From: djohns@elm.circa.ufl.edu (David A. Johns)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: Sexist language
- Message-ID: <38051@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu>
- Date: 27 Dec 92 00:40:39 GMT
- References: <BzJMLp.84o@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> <8040@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM> <BzMvK3.GD5@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>
- Sender: news@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu
- Organization: University of Florida, Gainesville
- Lines: 37
- Nntp-Posting-Host: elm.circa.ufl.edu
-
- In article <BzMvK3.GD5@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> mmmirash@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu (Mandar M. Mirashi) writes:
-
- # Yes, there are local standards. But which standard should be used
- # when resolving an inter-standard conflict? Obviously, it is the
- # English English standard.
-
- Ah, yes. The answer to the question no one asked.
-
- I understand "colour", you understand "color". Tolerance is much
- easier than conformity.
-
- # >Anything else is to claim that, say, a Canadian English
- # >dictionary is better or worse than, say, an Australian English
- # >dictionary. Shall we rank all the variants? To whose standards?
- # >
- # English English.
-
- Which English English?
-
- If you could somehow assign a value to every dialect of English
- in all English-speaking countries, such that the value reflected
- its distance from "Obsolete BBC Standard" English, you might be
- surprised to find out that all the dialects of the United
- States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, etc.,
- would have values well within the range of dialects that exist
- natively in England. Probably only some Scottish and Irish
- dialects would lie beyond that range.
-
- # This is because while different races were born at the same time in
- # different places, English was born in England.
-
- Indulging your naive metaphor for the nonce, so were American English,
- and Australian English, and ...
-
- David Johns
-
-
-