home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!tulane!uflorida!elm.circa.ufl.edu!djohns
- From: djohns@elm.circa.ufl.edu (David A. Johns)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: They (was Re: Shaking people up with "she"? (was Re: Sexist language))
- Message-ID: <38042@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu>
- Date: 25 Dec 92 12:38:18 GMT
- References: <BzJtDr.D3I@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> <BzMIqJ.3r9@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <BzMuyJ.FyD@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>
- Sender: news@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu
- Organization: University of Florida, Gainesville
- Lines: 31
- Nntp-Posting-Host: elm.circa.ufl.edu
-
- In article <BzMuyJ.FyD@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> mmmirash@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu (Mandar M. Mirashi) writes:
-
- # >>(Rosemary Waigh) writes:
- # >
- # >>>I know no one my age who rejects the semantically singular
- # >>>"they", except perhaps in extremely formal writing.
- # >>This is either ignorance or an attempt at being dense. Rosemary,
- # >>MANY persons on the soc.college newsgroups rejected the use of
- # >>"they" as in "That person isn't late, are they?" and *most* of
- # >>them are of your age.
- # >
- # >If you demonstrate anything with this example (and in others
- # >elsewhere) it is only that there are sentences in which the use
- # >of gender-neutral 'they' is not appropriate. But you claim that
- # >people reject it in general, which requires better evidence.
- #
- # *I* never made such a claim. I was simply countering Rosemary's
- # claim that people ALWAYS use "they"/"their", and consider it
- # "natural".
-
- Of course, Rosemary did not make that claim, if you read her words
- carefully.
-
- You are actually making the same mistake yourself that you're accusing
- her of.
-
- Interesting, interesting ...
-
- David Johns
-
-
-